Author
|
Message
|
Marc Boon
|
Saturday 10 June 2006 2:50:28 am
I'm trying to set up a role for translators, restricted to creating new translations of existing objects, and editing that translation, both restricted to a specific language. It appears that the content/edit function is required, the content/translate function alone doesn't give the user enough permissions to create a new translation. However, if a policy includes the content/edit function, the user can also create and remove object relations. How can I prevent that?
|
Marcin Drozd
|
Saturday 10 June 2006 4:12:48 am
Hi Marc
mayby try with:
content/create
content/edit
content/translate content/versionread - (Status( Draft , Published , Pending ))
http://ez-publish.pl
|
Marc Boon
|
Saturday 10 June 2006 5:27:06 am
Maybe I wasn't clear, but I want to limit the rights, rather than extend them, so I don't need content/create, and I want the translator to only edit text, not object relations. Content/edit is needed to translate/edit text fields, but it also allows creation/deletion of object relations, that's what I want to prevent.
|
Marcin Drozd
|
Saturday 10 June 2006 10:44:58 am
Hi Did U try to check "Disable translation" field in your class /Object relation attribute/ ?
http://ez-publish.pl
|
Marc Boon
|
Saturday 10 June 2006 11:05:01 am
I'm not talking about attribute relations here, but object relations on the object level, as specified in the Related Objects section at the bottom of the content/edit view.
|
Kristof Coomans
|
Sunday 11 June 2006 1:33:48 am
Hi Marc I think that what you want to achieve is not possible at the moment. You can always post an enhancement request for it.
independent eZ Publish developer and service provider | http://blog.coomanskristof.be | http://ezpedia.org
|
Marc Boon
|
Sunday 11 June 2006 3:21:01 am
In my opinion, to create translations of existing objects, the user should not need the content/edit function, just the content/translate function. But how it is setup in 3.8, translating content is done in the content/edit view, so a user who is doing just translations of existing objects also need permission for edit, and thus enabling creation/deletion of object relations.
So, it seems object translation is seen (by eZ publish developers) as an extension to object editing, rather than as a limitation, which would be more logical, in my opinion. I wonder how other creators of multi-language sites think about this.
|
Bernard Toure
|
Thursday 11 January 2007 12:29:19 am
Any news on this matter? Not being able to separate Edit right and Translation right is a real limitation for an international community deployment.
|